Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 41 - 60
of 446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2011, 4:38 am
As stated by the Texas Supreme Court in 1994, in Light v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
In the case of passing off, this requires that there be: (i) goodwill; (ii) misrepresentation; and (iii) damage (potential or actual).On this basis, the Judge also found that generalised statements had been made which were assertions, not evidence - as set out by DC, and flagged by the Judge:“[DC] owns goodwill in the United Kingdom in WONDER WOMAN a [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Linford: change in the mark can abandon former goodwill. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
The United States, participating as an amicus supporting reversal, takes a middle ground. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
It is reported that several years ago, the mark Pet Rock was registered as a trademark in the United States (unfortunately due to the power outage at the USPTO offices in suburban Washington DC, this Kat was unable to verify this information). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:38 am
The outcome: This appeal is from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas that, on remand from this court, granted-in-part Morris & Associates, Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:43 am
Perhaps The Judicial Conference of the United States should do the same for judges. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:21 am
Citing Mead Johnson & Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
United States [U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) applied this provision when it refused Steve Elster’s application to register the phrase “Trump Too Small” as a trademark for shirts. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
” A recent case from the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a trade name can be “distinct” when it incorporates two generic terms which are not typically linked together. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:31 am
It is also settled, says the Guicci Court, that “a showing of consumer confusion or harm to plaintiff’s goodwill in the United States is sufficient to demonstrate a substantial effect on interstate commerce”. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
In ITC Ltd v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School, R (on the application of) v The Archbishop of Westminster & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 433 (14 April 2011) H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) Marcroft v Heartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438 (14 April 2011) Desai v National Car Parks Services (NCP) [2011] EWCA Civ 402 (14 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Deeney, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 893 (14… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
People’s United Bank v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:54 am
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitOpinion Date: 2/12/10Cite: ANSYS, Inc. v. [read post]
