Search for: "United States v. Mendez"
Results 41 - 60
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
See also Mendez Lynch v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
Mendez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm
Mendez [Juan E. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit joined several other circuits in holding contrary to statute a Department of Justice (DOJ) regulation divesting the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of jurisdiction when an alien leaves the United States in Lin v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm
Taken together, the chapters trace the narrative arc of school desegregation in the United States, beginning in California in the 1940s, continuing through Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
She was happy to say: "I, Brianna Bolden-Hardge, vow to uphold the Constitutions of the United States and of the State of California while working in my role as an employee of the State Controller’s Office. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:25 pm
The United States may be headed by the former head of a reality show. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
(following Mendez) with United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:28 pm
" United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
United States Department of Transportation, Ray LaHood, Federal Highway Administration and Victor Mendez, Defendants, and Outdoor Advertising Association of America, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No 13-cv-0093. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:11 am
” ’ ” United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:19 am
On October 11, 2011 the Supreme Court of the United States denied plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari (Alt v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 1:12 pm
• In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Here is the heart of the per curiam opinion in White:In this sentencing appeal, after two members of the panel agreed to an opinion reversing the defendant's 14-year-upward adjustment based specifically on conduct for which the jury had acquitted the defendant, another panel of our court rendered an opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 9:50 am
Department of Transportation, the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Highway Administrator, the Virginia Department of Transportation, and the Secretary of the Virginia Department of Transportation. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:10 am
The paper was prompted by a recent Ninth Circuit ruling, United States v. [read post]
