Search for: "United States v. Miceli"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
With the regulatory stories of 2012 coming to an end, RegBlog would like to take this opportunity to reflect back on what has been a year of significant regulatory developments in the United States and throughout the world. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 10:22 am
The Supreme Court laid it out in a capital case, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
” Giles v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
To an observer from the United States, one of the most striking things about Israel, and the Middle East in general, is how small it is. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court questions whether lawyers, of which the United States has no shortage, provide more social utility than scientists, engineers, and inventors. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Pruitt, Jones Day, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Reporting regulation, Retail investors, SEC, SEC enforcement FCPA and the Commodity Exchange Act: A New Relationship Posted by David Yeres, David DiBari, and Robert Houck, Clifford Chance US LLP, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Anti-corruption, CFTC, Commodity… [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
It moved out until it reached that case of white mice there and then it - it wrapped itself around one of the mice! [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
[iv] At s. 4 [v] At ss. 5,6 [vi] Government of Canada. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
File this one right next to “Brown v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
