Search for: "United States v. Mix" Results 41 - 60 of 2,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2019, 10:38 pm by H. Scott Leviant
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held, in Timbs v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:21 am by Eric Goldman
Airbnb The post Airbnb Gets Mixed Results in Challenge to Boston’s Anti-Airbnb Law–Airbnb v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Fox v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 112, second paragraph.Of obviousness“In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent No. 6,718,436 following an adverse claim construction ruling from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:13 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Then follow chapters throwing new light on Commonwealth Caribbean, United States Novojo law, Turkey, South Africa, Sri Lanka, England and Ireland, the European Union, and Public International Law and International Trade Law; all showing that we are entering an era of legal studies involving looking at all legal systems anew. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:23 am by Legal Profession
Vice (great case name), the United States Supreme Court remanded to the lower court with instructions to determine attorney's fees where there is a mix of frivolous and non-frivolous... [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am by Susan Brenner
Code 1512(c)(1), the United States must prove [Mix] committed one of the prohibited acts `with the intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding’. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
  This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
It's always fun to watch an appellate court wriggle out of its dilemma when two rote rules clash, and the Second Circuit's decision in United State v. [read post]