Search for: "United States v. Mustafa"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 2:00 am
Tomorrow morning, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
In Othman (Abu Qatada) v United Kingdom, App. no. 8139/09, 17 January 2012, and again in Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat, Syed Tahla Ahsan and Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v United Kingdom, App. nos. 24027/07, 11949/08 and 36742/08, 10 April 2012, the ECtHR was able to consider a variety of challenges in the context of various DWAs and some ad hoc assurances, including from the US government concerning the death penalty and prison… [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
She previewed oral arguments in Al Janko v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
Today defense counsel to Mustafa al Hawsawi in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
The military judge ascends and calls United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
Walter Ruiz, a lawyer for 9/11 accused Mustafa al-Hawsawi, said this in a statement released earlier today: The judge ruled that the defense request is reasonable on its face and that the interests of justice are served by granting a continuance and those interests outweigh the best interests of the public and the accused in a prompt trial. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
In Ozgul v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
,”—and calling for “destruction of the United States,” and “the destruction of the Jewish people. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
Today the Chamber judgment of the ECHR came down in the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
Ohio and NAACP v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
DoD Press Release, here, announces: The Department of Defense announced today that the convening authority, Office of Military Commissions, referred charges to a military commission in the case of “United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
(Tickell is also correct that this represents a much lower “rate of defeat” for the UK than some other Contracting States.) [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
His failure to do so, to pin the blame on Mustafa, when he did blurt out that he wasn't the shooter, undermines the credibility of his trial testimony.The majority held, notably in contrast to the United States Supreme Court's misguided decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Sometime in 2010 Tahsin left the United States and was barred from reentry.Subsequently Muslu and Karakus each claimed to be the assignee of Tahsin's 36% interest. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:44 am
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected radical preacher Abu Hamza’s claim that his 2005-6 trial, at which he was convicted of soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges, was unfair. [read post]
