Search for: "United States v. Properties Described in Complaints" Results 41 - 60 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am by Rick St. Hilaire
§ 1581, the prosecutors maintain that "[t]his case is a complaint for civil forfeiture brought by the United States against the Defendant Property, and is therefore clearly not within the CIT’s jurisdiction." [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
Mar. 21, 2014) (paragraph break added): If the facts alleged in the complaint are true, this case involves an incident that is more like home raids by Red Guards during China’s Cultural Revolution than like what we should expect in the United States of America. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
In my 2019 article on Knick, I described reasons why federal courts are sometimes likely to protect constitutional property rights more fully than state courts (though that is by no means universally true). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:06 am by Zoe Bedell
In November 2007, the United States government issued an arrest warrant for Trabelsi on charges that he conspired with and provided support to Al Qaeda in order to kill U.S. nationals and use weapons of mass destruction to destroy property used by the U.S. government in Europe. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
However, after a year in the United States, the mother sought dissolution of the marriage and custody of the children in California state court. [read post]
 Glacier also contends that the Supreme Court of Washington’s decision conflicts with United States Supreme Court precedent including that labor law does not deprive an employer of their legal rights to possession and protection of their property. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court of Rhode Island, Providence. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm by Bill Ward
At the heart of this case is a question similar to those that are under consideration by the United States Supreme Court in the Florida case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court also states that if the Zoning Administrator concludes that MIA cannot build a school on its property as presently zoned, the case may be reopened with an amended complaint naming the new plaintiff. [read post]