Search for: "United States v. Rand"
Results 41 - 60
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential… [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Even in the most important non-EU European jurisdiction, the UK, SEP holders get far greater leverage than in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
The newspaper was ordered to apologise to the plaintiff for saying she “fixed the rand”. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
In United Steelworkers Local 2251 v Algoma Steel Inc., in an arbitration of a dual Canadian-American citizen working in Canada, but living on the American border. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
State Farm Gen. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:57 am
The Rand cases discusses what makes a statement admissible under this rule and under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am
Delrahim rightly states that “[w]e should not transform commitments to license on FRAND terms into a compulsory licensing scheme. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
