Search for: "United States v. Segal"
Results 41 - 60
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:55 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an opinion in the class action case National Veterans Legal Services Program, et. al., v United States (docket available here). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
At Slate, Eric Segall explains why, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Eric Segall is the Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
In a subsequent case several years later, the Appellate Division in Segal v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
In a subsequent case several years later, the Appellate Division in Segal v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am
Eric Segall in describing a recent article by Prof. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Segal, and Harold J. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:02 pm
These lawsuits were consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in December 2015. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
United States, a “once-in-a-decade insider trading case” that, he argues, presents “a valuable opportunity to clear the underbrush that has accumulated” in American insider trading law. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:10 am
FEC, Conflicts of interest, Institutional Investors, Pension funds, Political spending,Social capital, State law, Supreme Court Berkshire’s Blemishes: Lessons for Buffett’s Successors, Peers, and Policy Posted by Lawrence A. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
United States (that’s Walter Nixon, not Richard), which explained why it would be in appropriate to allow other branches to define or interfere with the exercise of the legislative branch’s checks on the judiciary. [read post]
