Search for: "United States v. Stanford" Results 41 - 60 of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 11:08 am by Melissa De Witte
In the United States, we don’t have a comprehensive legal framework at the federal level for protecting people’s data privacy. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm by EEM
Leadership Forsaken: Six Months of the Trump Refugee Bans (Human Rights First, July 2017) [text]"A Veteran ICE Agent, Disillusioned with the Trump Era, Speaks Out," New Yorker, 24 July 2017 [text]"White House Domestic Advisers Take Lead on Refugee Decision: Officials," Reuters, 26 July 2017 [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (22 July 2017)Tagged Publications. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:36 am
United States, No. 08-108, in conjunction with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation clinic and local counsel, Gary Koos of Koos & Meloy in Bettendorf, Iowa. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 9:07 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: On October 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court granted the... [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court confronted this issue in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
The part of DOMA denying federal recognition to same-sex marriages that were valid in the state the couple lived in was struck down as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
David Alan Sklansky (Stanford University) has posted The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:02 am by Gene Quinn
In a blow to the convention wisdom of Supreme Court patent-watchers, the Supreme Court actually affirmed the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]