Search for: "United States v. State of ND"
Results 41 - 60
of 482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 65 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:05 am
In Doe I v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
In State of California v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:15 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:10 am
Congress of the United States, (ND OH, Nov. 30, 2016), an Ohio federal district court rejected several challenges to the United States' use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:05 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:54 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
United States, 2018 U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:28 am
Patent No.7,789,110 (“the ’110 patent”), SSI appeals several pre- andpost-judgment orders from the United States DistrictCourt for the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:28 pm
UNITED CENTRAL BANK v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
Romanick, (ND Sup. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
Hochberg, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, was sitting by designation, a decision of ND Cal was affirmed and Apotex lost.As to standards of analysis:The determination of infringement is a two-step process, wherein the court first construes the claims and then determines whether every claim limitation, or its equivalent, is found in the accused device. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Now in State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:28 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:41 am
Our decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 11:38 am
He raises four challenges to his convictions and sentence: that his trial violated the Speedy Trial Act, that his firearm possession convictions are multiplicitous, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that his term of supervised release was imposed in violation of United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
