Search for: "United States v. State of South Dakota et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2016, 8:19 pm
CashCall, et al., No. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
U.S. et al. are very much a part of the 2016 presidential contest. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:10 pm
Johnson & Johnson et al. was won by Ms. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
Shiba Investments, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Western District of South Dakota – January 29th, 2016) involves a franchise agreement between the parties. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
District Court for the District of North Dakota, in State of Ohio, et al., v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
McCarthy, et al [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-02467-EAS-NMK (S.D. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:35 am
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 7:59 am
Map of South Dakota highlighting Union County (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the District of South Dakota Judge Karen Schreier will hear arguments from Beef Products, Inc (BPI) seeking to remand its $1.2 billion defamation suit against ABC News to state court, Reuters wire service reported.The case, Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al, 2012 WL 84723 (C.D. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
It has also sued the state of South Dakota for the same reason. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
App. 1997) (FDA regulatory status outside common law informed consent; discussion of status only required where FDA regulations say so).Since 2007, the only contrary authority that we know of was a rogue South Dakota federal court, predicting (in blatant violation of Erie principles) that South Dakota, uniquely, would allow a regulatory informed consent claim. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of iRunway India Private, Ltd.Amicus brief of Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of the TPL Group et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
USA Products Group Inc., et. al. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Tucker et al. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Rev. 835-889 (2010).ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
