Search for: "United States v. Vest"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2021, 11:28 am
On June 11, 2018, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear his appeal. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
New York State's Court of Appeals [NYCA] accepted certification of questions submitted to it by the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit [USCA] concerning the vesting of lifetime rights to retirement benefits by public employees of the State as the employer. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
New York State's Court of Appeals [NYCA] accepted certification of questions submitted to it by the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit [USCA] concerning the vesting of lifetime rights to retirement benefits by public employees of the State as the employer. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Arizona v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:03 am
Although the compensation SUNY component units offered was competitive and it offered significant opportunities for career development, candidates proved reluctant to accept appointment to a SUNY position as the State's public retirement systems then required an individual to complete ten years of member service to vest his or her retirement benefits. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:14 am
Against the Imperial Presidency.When the Founders agreed that "[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America," the core phrase had a single, simple, and uncontested meaning. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
See Edmond v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
Constitution—has the bland ring of a human resources circular: “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
