Search for: "United States v. White Eagle"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
United States, No. 4P10-cv-01565-CW (N.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
Since 2012, she has headed the Post Conviction Unit and she reviews claims of actual innocence. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:52 am
These cases include United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 12:01 am
‘During arguments Jan. 15 in Lambrix v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
Because as long as the Obama Administration continues to ignore this sort of thing, you could be the Michelangelo of Home Preservation and it won’t matter because your ceiling’s being covered in a Navajo White semi-gloss with a stipple effect. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:43 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
The United States also slapped sanctions on entities based in China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who often was in dissent in the court’s 5-4 decisions each term, once offered what seemed to be a message not just about the court but for all Americans when they believe the court is “out of whack” in whatever direction: Referring to her late husband, Ginsburg remarked, “Marty used to say the true symbol of the United States is not the bald eagle. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IP tango) Poland Poland: White Eagle cannot be a trade mark (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court clarifies on when to start a civil trade mark infringement case (Class 46) Sweden Svea Court of Appeal finds claim anticipated - construes claim on basis of terms of the claim, rather than purposive construction adopted by District Court: Pullman-Ermator v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
The Court said that for a U.S. court to have jurisdiction to hear these ATS claims, the claims must “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
