Search for: "United States v. Zhang" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2022, 7:17 am by Thalia Kruger
As background, it is important to note that the recognition and enforcement of foreign country judgments in the United States is generally governed by state law. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
President Biden stated that in addition to economic sanctions that the United States had previously imposed on Russia, the United States would also prohibit Russian planes from entering U.S. air space. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:21 am
Unlike the United States and Singapore, the only two other countries where death is administered by injection, China metes out capital punishment from specially equipped “death vans” that shuttle from town to town. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
The dissonance between action/interests and Chinese foreign policy principles (as stated by a high official at the end of 2021 HERE), was evident in the statement by Chinese officials in support of abstention:Elaborating on China’s abstention, Beijing’s envoy, Zhang Jun, said the resolution did not undergo “full consultations with the whole membership” of the assembly. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
” At the Burnham Gorokov Blog, Ziran Zhang looks at the Court’s ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
GroveCase number: 14-cv-61685 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida)Case filed: July 24, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 31, 2014 08/21/2014 11/19/2014 2014-82 SEC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]