Search for: "Vermont v. Herring"
Results 41 - 60
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
Levine $6.7 million for her trauma. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:10 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:37 am
In Ostergren v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 5:09 pm
State v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 3:07 pm
"State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 12:17 pm
Pierce v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
Ratner would have me note that she is a registered Republican and a staunch defender of Second Amendment rights; her arrest result when she “inadvertently stepped into a liberal trap when [she] came down [to Massachusetts] from Vermont. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:09 pm
How has the Supreme Court's decision in favor of Diana Levine, a Vermont woman who lost her arm after being injected with an anti-nausea drug, changed the future of state-level tort suits? [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 11:28 pm
By Merrill BentFelis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
Supreme Court today upheld a verdict and judgment for a Vermont woman who lost her forearm to amputation after injection of Wyeth's anti-nausea drug, Phenergan. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
Felicia Kornbluh, University of Vermont, discussed A Woman’s Life is a Human Life: My Mother, Her Neighbor, and the Journey from Reproductive Rights to Reproductive Justice last Tuesday at Northwestern University (Daily Northwestern).John Quincy Adams’s notes in Head & Amory v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
" The ruling comes in a case in which plaintiff Heather Brassner asked the Florida court to dissolve her same-sex Vermont civil union. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
We remember her in a separate tribute here. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 11:46 am
Nesti v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
In her motion, Goding citedU.S. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 7:37 am
Ward v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:02 am
Trademark Policing v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals holds that a Vermont woman who suffered retaliation after speaking to the newspaper and testifying before a public board about job-related matters does not have a claim under the First Amendment because her speech was not protected under the Supreme Court's Garcetti decision, which holds that speech is unprotected if the plaintiff made it pursuant to her official job duties.The case is Bearss v. [read post]