Search for: "Vigil v. Industrial Commission" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
These agencies and the Federal Trade Commission have offered guidance to help curb these attacks. [read post]
These agencies and the Federal Trade Commission have offered guidance to help curb these attacks. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
For instance, see the Ontario Human Rights Commissions’ Policy on drug and alcohol testing 2016. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm by Robert B. Milligan
The European Commission’s directive on trade secret protection will mark a sea-change in protection of trade secrets throughout the European Union. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm by Robert B. Milligan
The European Commission’s directive on trade secret protection will mark a sea-change in protection of trade secrets throughout the European Union. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Author
The California Labor Code (§ 226.7) reads in part: “An employer shall not require an employee to work during a meal or rest or recovery period mandated pursuant to an applicable statute, or applicable regulation, standard, or order of the Industrial Welfare Commission. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:22 am by Joy Waltemath
The state high court found no support for an employer’s argument that the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) created through its wage orders a default presumption that employers could impose duties on employees during their rest periods. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:41 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
The Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders clearly state that employees must be “relieved of all duty” during meal periods. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
  Public agencies should now be more vigilant than ever in pursuing their constitutional right to reimbursement of state mandates. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In a separate order, Marsh agreed to an industry and penny stock bar with the right to apply for reentry after five years. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Sara Bodnar
The 2009 Supreme Court decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The named plaintiffs allege that OPM failed to implement and maintain adequate cyber-security measures to protect the class members’ PII and PPI.[7]   Regulatory Actions The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has been the most active federal regulator policing corporate cyber-security practices. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:21 am by Andrea Patrick
” Pregnancy Discrimination Since Young v UPS was informally resolved between the parties following the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:24 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), organizations will need to remain vigilant in 2016 to ensure they are addressing industry specific rules or guidance regarding cybersecurity and the safeguarding of the information they maintain. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am by John McFarland
Another recent example is BCCA Appeal Group, Inc. v. [read post]