Search for: "W & W Holdings, LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 1,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
During the pendency of the appeal, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Jack Daniel’s, holding that “[w]ithout deciding whether Rogers has merit in other contexts, we hold that it does not when an alleged infringer uses a trademark in the way the Lanham Act more cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:25 pm by Timothy Misner
Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co., LLC, 977 F.3d 1039, 1046 (11th Cir. 2020); see also Barrows v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Family Dispute Owen emanates from a protracted legal dispute venued in Rochester’s Surrogate’s and Supreme Courts between Christine Owen (“Christine”) and her brother, Robert W. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Must work in the Unibestos facility – Tyler, TX; no secondary exposure claims; 1 year exposure required of which 1 day must be between 12/31/73-12/31/92; 3 year dodeath statute; no statute for living maligs TH Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC (THAN) Fiber supply to many drywall companies Payment percetage 30% Bondex – Kelly Moore Exposure Thorpe Insulation Co. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[7] Crown Bridge would purchase convertible notes from penny stock issuers, hold the notes for a period of time, and subsequently convert the notes into unrestricted, newly issued shares of stock at a discount to the prevailing market price and resell those shares into the market. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 1:39 pm by bklemm@foley.com
” The court denied CVS’s motion to dismiss holding that it was a question of fact “[w]hether th[e] qualification on the back label clears up a consumer’s potential confusion that the Product kills 99.9% of germs. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:51 pm by Kelsey C. Boehm and Erik K. Swanholt
” The court denied CVS’s motion to dismiss holding that it was a question of fact “[w]hether th[e] qualification on the back label clears up a consumer’s potential confusion that the Product kills 99.9% of germs. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Sullivan, which holds that public figures cannot recover for defamation consistent with the First Amendment unless they demonstrate the press acted recklessly or knowing their statements were false. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm by Lauren Guichard and Andrew Young
The Court granted summary judgment for the defendant, holding that the hazardous condition at issue was open and obvious, and thus that the defendant owed no duty to the plaintiff. [read post]