Search for: "W. (K.) VS. S. (J.)" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Kemmler, William vs. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
After an average 12-year follow-up period, no differences were observed in the rates of sexual (21.1% vs 21.8%), violent (42.9% vs. 44.5%) or general (any) recidivism (56.6% vs 60.4%) for treated and untreated groups, respectively. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The New York Times had a piece “NY High Court Keeps Woman’s Suit vs. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 7:34 am by Erik J. Heels
Yesterday is the past, tomorrow is the future, but today is a gift that’s why it is called the present! [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Sotheby’s, an international auction house, was put to rest after the jury decided in favor of Sotheby’s. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Coral Beach
Your firm’s RTE finished product rice noodles are not refrigerated and are not labeled for refrigeration. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Fort Bend County, June 20, 2018, Elrod, J.). 6th Cir.: CBAs clear; no lifetime healthcare benefits for Honeywell retirees. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The authors nonetheless recommended the full battery because the latter tests provide some measure of performance impairment (vs. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:57 am by Ron (mailto:ron@prismlegal.com)
Jones, Co-Managing Director, Hildebrandt Baker Robbins; Chairman of the Hildebrandt Institute Panelists: William J. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.Criminal law -- Guilty plea -- Vacation -- Failure of trial court to advise defendant of immigration and deportation consequences of plea -- Trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to vacate guilty plea on ground that state failed to carry burden of proving that plea colloquy informed defendant of consequences of plea -- Burden of proof was on defendant to prove that colloquy did not inform him of consequences of pleaTHE STATE OF… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Those elements motivate core differences in the Court’s interpretive debates over fundamental privileges versus promises, textualism versus purposivism, status quo-preserving originalism vs. rights-promoting pragmatism.[4] I aim to explore those elements with an eye to the plurality of opinions that emerge from shared legal texts, now that stare decisis is in question as a way to settle them and now that interpretations of history and tradition matter a lot toward the same… [read post]