Search for: "WERE V. GARLAND" Results 41 - 60 of 710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland – 5th Circuit Court of Appeal (9-27-21) Kahumbu v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
The objections were meritless because the rules of evidence don't apply to such hearings under Granados v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:20 am
  In other news, he also introduced Judge Merrick Garland, Chief of the DC Circuit, as his nominee to the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:24 am
But I would think that, particularly in the context of a prior restraint, it wouldn't be permissible for the government to try to hide, say, that 4500 subpoenas (rather than 450) were issued annually to Twitter. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am by Amy Howe
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:43 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Khan’s primary contention on appeal is that the district court erred in concluding that intelligence reports offered by the government to prove his membership in an HIG cell were reliable. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
Additionally, the law is not narrowly tailored — less restrictive measures such as an agreement involving data security protocols with TikTok were already under negotiation. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
Additionally, the law is not narrowly tailored — less restrictive measures such as an agreement involving data security protocols with TikTok were already under negotiation. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
  You be the judge.It's a case about whether the BIA properly evaluated changed circumstances in Indonesia, which in turn required the Ninth Circuit to decide if evangelical Christians were treated worse than different minority religions in Indonesia. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage, Nicole Schneider discusses State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]