Search for: "WOLFE v. GOODING & COMPANY, INC."
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
” The Court explained, “The plan, in short, is at the center of ERISA,” citing US Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 12‐364‐cv (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:42 pm
Star Scientific, Inc. appears to be a former tobacco company that now produces dietary supplements. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
McNeil-PPC, Inc., 2009 WL 1178651, at *3-4 (Pa. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm
Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
They lost on standing grounds (e.g., Democratic Underground, Wolf). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
The Michigan Court of Appeals, in Actuator Specialties, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm
Apple, Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
Stevenson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:13 pm
As explained by Wolf v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:02 am
It appears that Alnylam is in the news again, and not in a good way. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm
See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:28 pm
Wolf v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
