Search for: "Wall v. Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
An opinion piece for the New York Times defends the Court’s decision in the animal cruelty case, United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Stone was a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice William J. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws: “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws: “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Massachusetts' Supreme Judicial Council found that even a passenger in a car had standing to challenge GPS evidence used against him. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:59 pm
The lower court's preliminary injunction was subsequently upheld by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruling on December 9, 2008 on a direct appellate review. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 7:08 am
” –Justice Robert Cordy, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Today, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled against foreclosing lenders and those who purchased foreclosed properties in Massachusetts in the controversial U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
Catanzaro where the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that police officers with a search warrant specifically indicating the authority to search "any person present" who detained the defendant and his girlfriend outside her home acted reasonably under both the United States and Massachusetts Constitutions. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Barely 24 hours old — the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
The ultra-conservative Supreme Court majority lowered the wall of separation between church and state, limited the ability of states to pass reasonable gun laws, and reversed Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm
That, too, was struck down by the lower courts, although the Supreme Court upheld it on a 5-4 vote along party lines. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
The court below reasoned that the Massachusetts Supreme Court had adopted Restatement (Second) Torts, section 402A, comment K. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
For that reason, in the 1970s, the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which is our state supreme court, did away with all of these distinctions and required that a homeowner or property owner must act in a reasonable and prudent manner so as to prevent a foreseeable injury to foreseeable persons and property. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Samahon writes that when the case reached the Supreme Court, “[t]he Court’s heavy reliance on the Scalia opinion below means that the substance of its analysis can be fairly added to the Scalia separation-of-powers canon. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:41 pm
Insured Gets The Short End Of The Insurance Coverage Stick For Parking Lot & Building Flooding The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has not been too kind to insureds these days. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The Wall argued that both cases should be granted along with the Baltimore case. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
The story of the Supreme Court would be very different without that sort of independence. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 7:37 am
City of Newton, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) held these agreements are generally enforceable. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following: Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal court… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Second, there is danger in countenancing extravagant theories of state standing that have exploded in the wake of this Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
