Search for: "Warner v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2007, 6:03 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia certified a class of "[a]ll persons or entities in the United States who purchased Ovcon 35 directly from Warner Chilcott at any time during the period April 22, 2004, through Dec. 31, 2006. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:52 am
A report published by the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) earlier this month has further highlighted the dearth of comparable, decision-useful ESG disclosures sought by investors. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
Last Thursday however, the Third Department affirmed a dismissal of the class action suit finding that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action in Baron v Pfizer, Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 05813. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm by axd10
The United States Supreme Court recognized this right in Bad Elk v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
At the DIDA site, under Document Sources, you can read about some of those drug company lawsuits, in particular: United States of America ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:08 am
  The Commission’s strategy passed muster with a reviewing court in the United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Government defense contracts, and was awarded a $298 million contract to support the United States’ war effort in Afghanistan. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Dennis Crouch
    On <Date>, United States Letters Patent No. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am by Dennis Crouch
This term, for instance, the Supreme Court is also considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in a case known as Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]