Search for: "Washington Post v. US Dept. of State" Results 41 - 60 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Washington, the Court granted the petition for review, vacated the state high court’s judgment, and remanded. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
June 7, 2018) (purported class action removed from state to federal court alleging Charter Communications has failed to provide certain internet and cable services in violation of state law) Washington v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:15 pm by EEM
Publications:"Battle Emerging Inside Trump Administration Over Who Controls Immigration and Refugees," Washington Post, 9 July 2017 [text]- See also related Lawfare blog post, "What Sort of Issue is Immigration? [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Strausfeld summary is posted on the Internet at:http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/news/fired-for-using-internal-email-system-to-send-religious-messages-fire-captain-loses-free-speech-claim/? [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Decisions involving an employee’s use of the employer's electronic equipment that resulted in disciplinary action being taken against an employee [Internet links highlighted in color]Sprague v Spokane Valley Fire Department Sprague v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court –Queens County, New York:  People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
It is posted here for the benefit of Massachusetts elder law attorneys facing similar MassHealth trust denials. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 And so, here's a post devoted to catching up, in three parts. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Under Washington state law, an employee terminated for misconduct connected with her work is not entitled to benefits. [read post]