Search for: "Washington v. Fisher"
Results 41 - 60
of 491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
Molly Runkle rounded up early coverage and commentary for this blog of the Court’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
But barring a surprise Trump win in the presidential election (which I would find even more distressing than the Court’s decision), few if any Court-watchers expect any significant restraint on racial preferences to come from the Justices after this decision, Fisher v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 pm
Court will hear case of mariner charged with Sarbanes-Oxley records-destruction violation for discarding undersized fish [Jonathan Adler, Eugene Volokh, Daniel Fisher] SCOTUS goes 9-0 for wider patent fee shifting in Octane Fitness v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 8:56 am
The Washington Post humors the super-silly liberal fantasy of impeaching Justice Scalia for discussing the affirmative action mismatch argument, an argument that 1) was briefed by lawyers in the case at hand, Fisher v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Stetson of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent Fairchild Corporation. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Fairfield Smith, one of Fisher’s colleagues, acknowledged that Bristol nailed Fisher’s Exact test, with all eight cups correctly identified. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
Here are the materials in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
The Court’s cert. grant last Thursday in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
Washington, but seemed to ignore in its Puyallup decision. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm
“American Express Settlement Collapses Amid Charges Of Collusion” [Daniel Fisher] Some on Capitol Hill would like U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
Millett of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:45 am
Nebraska Supreme Court refuses to require wholesale disruption of criminal prosecutions although the some courts have suggested that the cases Crawford v Washington and Davis v Washington required the in court testimony of technical witnesses to give the necessary foundation testimony for breath tests and speed detecting radar guns. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
Today’s coverage of the Court focuses on the myriad amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:04 am
[NPR] * One of the opinions we hope will drop at the Supreme Court today is that of the Fisher v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
Washington). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
In Musacchio v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:41 pm
Fisher, C.A. [read post]
