Search for: "Washington v. Norman"
Results 41 - 60
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” At Local 10 News, Bob Norman interviews Fane Lozman, whose First Amendment retaliatory-arrest suit the court revived this week in Lozman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:43 am
Norman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Mark Lewis Law v Taylor Hampton, heard 25-27 and 30-31 October 2017 (Moulder J). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:18 am
Ind., Case No. 3:05-md-00527); call center workers (Norman, et al., v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on McCoy v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 2:57 am
Constitution by David Mayer and on the rule of law by Norman Barry; Following big First Amendment win in Slants case Matal v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:07 am
When the Supreme Court extended the right of assembly beyond the federal government to the states in its unanimous 1937 decision, De Jonge v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:48 am
From CREW Press Release: Washington, DC–When the courts opened at 9 am this morning, a legal dream team officially filed Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Luis v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am
” One of those cases was the 2012 decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
Washington because the court did not appreciate the prejudice inherent to Appellant from the absence of a jury instruction defining heat of passion given that the instruction was crucial to Appellant's defense. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
Washington because the court did not appreciate the prejudice inherent to Appellant from the absence of a jury instruction defining heat of passion given that the instruction was crucial to Appellant’s defense. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
Today's highlights at the AALS Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C.: Retirement Policy: Incremental v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
See Stewart v. [read post]
