Search for: "Watts et al v. Watts et al" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Petra Moser (Stanford Dep’t of Economics)Topic: Measuring the Effects of Patents on Private Incentives, Commenting on: James Bessen et al., The Costs and Benefits of United States Patents (2014)Estimating private costs and benefits of US patents owned by publicly held firms. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
Bambauer, Saura Masconale, et. al., Reckless Associations, 36 Harv. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by bndmorris
Herrera, Amber Baylor, et al., Evaluating Legal Needs, 36 Notre Dame J.L. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:32 pm
In the case of Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm by Marta Requejo
Supreme Court and the Future of Human Rights Keitner on Human Rights Enforcement through Transnational Litigation New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Spece Jr. et al., (Implicit) Consent to Intimacy, 50 IND. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm by bndmorris
Radavoi, Elizabeth Crawford Spencer, et. al., Law-Guided CSR: Ten Commandments for the 21st Century, 9 Loy. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]