Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 12,192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 5:26 pm
EFF signed on to an amicus brief drafted by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers earlier this month petitioning the Oregon Supreme Court to review State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:31 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:18 am
[Frantic, Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London case number B326222, in the Court of Appeal in the State of California, Second Appellate District (18 March 2024)] [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am
Judge Breyer of the Northern District of California had none of it. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
To understand AB 3233, we first need to understand what the California Supreme Court said (and didn’t say) in Chevron, U.S.A. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:34 am
Additionally, Reed Smith’s San Francisco office will be hosting a comprehensive hybrid-CLE event on April 10 on recent legislation from Washington state and California as well as what to expect going forward with regard to health data privacy. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
” This year’s recipient is Gerardo Con Díaz, Yale University, for Patent Law and the Materiality of Inventions in the California Oil Industry: The Story of Halliburton v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
Susan V. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:16 am
From Fink v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds the 2021… [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Last year, California became the first state to pass laws requiring companies to make disclosures about their greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions as well as the risks that climate change poses for their businesses and their plans for addressing those risks. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
And so perhaps we should not be surprised that California courts have opened the door to a resurgence in anemic digital conversion claims, as well. [read post]
