Search for: "Wells v. Mohammad" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
Restrictions on the sale of meat on the basisof religious sentiments alone have found favour with the Supreme Court in caseslike OmPrakash v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 4:07 am by Alex Potcovaru
Moscati on developments in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
 India Following defamation proceedings against a senior advocate who made statements about a well-known business family, the High Court of Delhi ruled that statements made by lawyers during the course of judicial proceedings must be subject to absolute privilege. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court took judicial note of this fact in Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court took judicial note of this fact in Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by JURIST Staff
These allegations result in job discrimination, ostracism and exile, as well as violence and murder at the hands of enraged mobs. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am by Sarah Taitz
” The government has relied on Section 702 queries in ordinary criminal investigations as well. [read post]