Search for: "William Black v. US" Results 41 - 60 of 1,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986) Gonzaga University v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Speaker Williams, who goes by his first name Rob, is often confused with Jim Miller, who has insisted that he is not in fact Speaker Steve Smith. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Acheson came to the Supreme Court last November, asking the justices to weigh in. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Yesterday, Samantha Barbas present on her book, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:46 am by Dennis Crouch
  Justices Hugo Black and William Douglas jointly wrote a dissent concluding that patents should be limited to their literal scope based upon the claim language. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
And, in one of the most interesting episodes Sloan documents, Justice William O. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm by Ilya Somin
In addition, he has some useful commentary on the issue of whether Trump must be acquitted because he genuinely believed the election was stolen from him. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Muckleshoot Tribal Court (Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Dissolution of Marriage) Lula Williams et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 4 July 2023, Heather Williams J heard preliminary arguments and a strike out application in Davidoff v Hargrave. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]