Search for: "Williams v. General Mills" Results 41 - 60 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
Section Two of the bill requires the attorney general to submit certain information about presidential pardons for specific offenses identified in the bill. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Following Mill, Woodrow Wilson, then a professor at Princeton University, argued that in the constitutional scheme, Congress’s ability to provide what he called “vigilant oversight of administration” was just as important as its legislative power.The Supreme Court generally has agreed with Wilson’s view. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am by Nicholas Mosvick
President William McKinley had nominated McKenna, his own Attorney General, on January 21, 1898. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
This run-of-the-mill scenario would not amount to bribery. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm by Unknown
Bruhl does not cite specific examples, but highlights of this impressive body of work include William Richman & William Reynolds, Injustice on Appeal(2012); Bert Huang, “Lightened Scrutiny,” 124 Harv. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Plaintiffs' purported equitable cause of action, based only on an ultra vires claim, would have been unknown to William Blackstone, Chancellor Kent, or Justice Story. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” Certainly—as was suggested during our conversation on the Lawfare podcast last month—we would expect members to ask different kinds of questions during hearings if the goal is to establish a case for impeachment than if they are doing more general investigative work. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Scott Bomboy
Chemerinsky says that in Youngstown Sheet that, “Justice William O. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
They were sharply critical of the lower court’s decision striking down the 2016 map, telling the justices that if “there is indeed a theory of standing for adjudicating generalized partisan grievances and a justiciable test for separating unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders from run-of-the-mill consideration of partisan advantage by legislatures organized on party lines, they will have to come from this Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]