Search for: "Williams-Sonoma Stores Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Greg Blankinship
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., 51 Cal. 4th 524 (2011) that the collection of zip codes is unlawful. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Ed
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., — Cal. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:23 am by Charles Internicola
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. (2011 WL 44692), which overturned an earlier Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:07 am by Daniel O'Rielly
Williams Sonoma Stores, Inc., the California Supreme Court last week held that requesting and recording a credit cardholder's ZIP Code violates the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Kevin
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., the court found that found that a person's zip code was "personal identification information" under California law. ('Personal identification information' and 'personally identifiable information' are also terms of art within the privacy community.) [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:14 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. that ZIP codes are “personal identification information” under the state’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (the “Credit Card Act”). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Andrew Lustigman
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., that ZIP codes are also "personally identifiable information" for purposes of the Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:21 pm by Olivia
William-Sonoma Stores, Inc., the justices ruled unanimously that such requests violate a state law that prohibits merchants from collecting “personal identification information. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:02 pm
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. will be reported in CCH Advertising Law Guide and CCH Privacy Law in Marketing. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:42 am by Matt C. Bailey
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., __ Cal.4th__ (2011), holding that a retailer’s practice of requesting and recording a consumer’s zip code during a credit card transaction violates Cal. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:49 am by Toni Guarino
  So similar that Williams-Sonoma, Inc. stepped in with a demand letter, claiming Copyright and Trademark Infringement, and Trademark Dilution. [read post]