Search for: "Young v. Merit Systems Protection Board" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Reid and MacKinnon's checklist on protection of IPR in China (IP Dragon) China/Hong Kong: WIPO Copyright Treaty and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty in effect in Hong Kong after PRC (IP Dragon) Protect your IP rights in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates)   Finland M&M and Taloustutkimus survey of most respected brands in Finland (Class 46)   France Electronic filing of trade mark applications (Class 46)  … [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 8:31 pm by Guest Author
Created to manage the repayment of Revolutionary War debt—a crushing financial obligation that threatened the young republic’s very survival—this five-member board included the Secretary of the Treasury (Alexander Hamilton), the Secretary of State (Thomas Jefferson), the Attorney General (Edmund Randolph), Vice President John Adams, and Chief Justice John Jay. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If they’d fail on the merits, why have 230? [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The statutory right to counsel under Family Court Act § 262 affords protections equivalent to the constitutional standard of effective assistance of counsel afforded to defendants in criminal proceedings. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In our view, they should be protected from harm when they do so. [25] The law has proven very good at this type of protection in the physical realm. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Electronic Frontier Foundation)   Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 23 June: US LSI: ‘Multilateral patents’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 23 June: STEP / Committee on National Statistics conference on ‘Intangible assets: measuring and enhancing their contribution to corporate value and economic… [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Can you give us your take on this and does litigation to protect intellectual property rights stifle innovation? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am by Graham Smith
In our view, they should be protected from harm when they do so. [25]The law has proven very good at this type of protection in the physical realm. [read post]