Search for: "5 Cal.4th 1" Results 581 - 600 of 995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
Ghaderi (2008) 44 Cal.4th 570 (Simmons), mandated such a result. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am by Chloe Chung and Alyssa Sones
State Bd. of Equalization, 19 Cal.4th 1, 7–8 (Cal. 1998) (“The standard for judicial review of agency interpretation of the law is the independent judgment of the court, giving deference to the determination of the agency appropriate to the circumstances of the agency action. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Ryobi America Corp., 181 F.3d 608, 611 (4th Cir. 1999) (applying Maryland law) (emphasis added). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:53 am by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
So the vote was 5-2 on the majority opinion, but on the issues, it was 7-0 on keeping existing gay marriages in place, and 6-1 in favor of upholding Prop 8 as a valid amendment to the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
The Charity Navigator website does not rate CERT because its annual revenue is below $1 million. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am by Schachtman
American Standard, Inc. 43 Cal.4th 56, 72 (2008). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Bruce Nye
Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296, the Cal Supremes pretty much reinvented the legal defense of “assumption of risk. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
City of Manhattan Beach (2011) 52 Cal.4th 155 did not dissuade subsequent (unsuccessful) suits in Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]