Search for: "A I X Operating Co" Results 581 - 600 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
They become co-producers, and co-assessors of legal knowledge, breaking up lawyers’ monopoly in law school 8. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Yuval Shany
Arguably, international law does not bar the exercise of legal rights when some of the motivations underlying their invocation are illegitimate, provided that legitimate motivations are also at play and are sufficiently dominant (cf. discussion of the legality of international coalition operations against Libya in 2011). [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
The Bench was of the opinion that as the issue would arise in a very large number of cases, it was required to be referred to a larger Bench as the judgment in Akbar Sheikh and Gopinath Ghosh had been rendered by co-ordinate Benches of this Court. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
 I have broken it into 5 parts for ease of reading. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
Another key early case was that of Koch & Sterzel (T 26/86), which related to a software-implemented method of controlling an X-Ray apparatus for radiological imaging. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nye and I (with the help of UCLA School of Law student Skyler Ross) have filed an amicus brief, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
You or I could hold digital Federal Reserve dollars or Bank of Japan yen in our digital wallets and use these balances to buy coffee. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
 I have broken it into 5 parts for ease of reading. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Whether C5 forms prior art because it was communicated to the opponent’s representative (recipient stage)[4.3] The parties admitted that there was a substantial level of co-operation between them and other professional representatives in order to create a test case. [read post]