Search for: "A. R. F. Products, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
See Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:42 pm
” Instead, the district court, citing United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
David F. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
”United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Twin Cont’l Films, Inc., 783 F.2d 1440, 1443 (9th Cir. 1986).Id. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
Apple Inc., 672 F. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
United States, 607 F.2d 695, 702 (5th Cir.1979). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:52 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:09 pm
Also, citing United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
The generic defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the United States Supreme Court held in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
The rule on this head is aptly stated by Mr. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:55 am
CAS Medical Systems Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
Ogilvie Mills, Inc., 76 F.3d 1178, 1181 (Fed. [read post]
