Search for: "BENNETT v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 1,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
There was a 1995 case out of the First District Court of Appeals, Bennett v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
There was a 1995 case out of the First District Court of Appeals, Bennett v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Bennett, 290 Mich.App 465, 472; 802 NW2d 627 (Court of Appeals of Michigan 2010). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:23 am
" A copy of the file was transmitted to the Grievance Committee of the Circuit for such action as it sees appropriate.The decision in Bennett v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by Laura Appleman
Bennett, and the efficacy of Oregon’s “disclosure only” systemof regulating contributions to political campaigns for state office. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A [*2]motion to compel responses to demands and interrogatories is properly denied where the demands and interrogatories seek information which is irrelevant, overly broad, or burdensome” (Bennett v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm by Kevin Sheerin
  Bennett issued a general order setting out the new disciplinary proceedings policy providing, among other things, that such proceedings would in the future be governed by Second Class Cities Law §137, pursuant to which Bennett would be the sole trier of fact and the formerly-confidential disciplinary hearings would be open to the public. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]