Search for: "Boring v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 1,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2017, 10:24 am by Eric Goldman
* From India: The Supreme Court of India today directed Google, Yahoo and Microsoft to set up an in-house mechanism to remove online search results, which has “potential to go counter”to Section 22 of the Pre-Conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 (Act). * Techdirt: Feds Say Jewelry Company CEO Scrubbed Google Results With Fake Court Orders And Forged Judge’s Signatures * In IMDb v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:44 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Chance Decker Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. et al v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
United States in which the Supreme Court that “a district court must instruct the jury that knowledge of the characteristics (e.g., the core diameter of a Street Sweeper) bringing a firearm under the coverage of the National Firearms Act is a necessary element of the possession of an unregistered firearm …”   Two months after Staples, the Eighth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Last week, the Third Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Castleberry v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm by Giles Peaker
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Claiming the affirmative defense of "privilege"Casey v State of New York,  2017 NY Slip Op 01922, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentOffice of Court Administration's [OCA] sole contention is that the Court of Claims court should have found that its "detention" of Colleen Casey, a senior court officer, was privileged* on the ground that a designated superior's authority to command Casey through lawful orders carried with it a privilege to keep… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]