Search for: "Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia" Results 581 - 600 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
For example, the Wyoming Supreme Court held that youth within the justice system forfeit their right to education.[16] Accordingly, tying the right to be vaccinated to the right to education will not capture the needs or interests of all young people. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in the Citizens United case. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Asbestos Corporation Limited, a Virginia trial court upheld the defense for asbestos sales after 1970.[10] The courts in Triplett and Bean emphasized the equality of knowledge of asbestos hazards among suppliers and employers. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
Supreme Court has ruled that violations committed either with knowledge or in reckless disregard of FCRA requirements could be considered “willful” (Safeco Insurance Co of America v Burr). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The Supreme Court has held that if the government wants to introduce a lab report (for example, saying that powder found in the defendant's possession was cocaine), the defendant has a right to cross-examine an analyst about how that lab report was produced. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Bush -- in which the Supreme Court gave detainees the right to habeas corpus -- and in Boumediene v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
Wednesday's post, This Crossroads Moment, highlights the central modern question for law and policy: whether to take the final step in the historical sequence from structural sexism to sex skepticism—where the Supreme Court left us in 1996 in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am by Guest Author
Department of Labor); the COVID-19 eviction moratorium (Alabama Ass’n of Realtors); the Clean Power Plan (West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  In Hall (1917), and two companion cases, with only Justice McReynolds dissenting, the Supreme Court rejected various constitutional challenges to dealer-licensing and second-gen specific-approval statutes. [read post]