Search for: "Campbell v. People" Results 581 - 600 of 772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am by SHG
But when they speak of gravity knives today, it’s a very different animal, as revealed in Bronx Supreme Court Justice Troy Webber’s opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm by Dave_Fagundes
  They’re parodies (because they mock the original work directly), and while that’s not dispositive of the issue, parodies are a form of use that’s strongly favored as fair following Campbell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Wings Over Scotland blogger Stuart Campbell took Dugdale to court in a £25,000 defamation action over an article she wrote for the Daily Record accusing him of making homophobic tweets. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:45 am by Dianne Saxe
[i] They recommend that people take “precautions”. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Brodies websit had a piece entitled “Stuart Campbell v Kezia Dugdale and the defence of fair comment for defamation in Scotland“. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:25 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The TV presenter and naturalist Chris Packham sued the Editor of Country Squire Magazine over three allegations published on its website which alleged, among other things, that he had misled people in order to raise money for a tiger rescue charity. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Samuelson: Dreyfuss earlier asked why eBay would apply to copyright injunctions: the SCt had three previous cases saying that non-injunctive relief could be more appropriate as a remedy even for non-fair uses—Campbell, Stewart v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Let us take, for example, the leading case of Naomi Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457, concerning a well known model with a drug problem. [read post]