Search for: "Cherry v Cherry"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
The CKS paper makes a contribution and it is great that the authors are able to make their data public, but it is dangerous for policy makers to base judgments on highly selective “cherry picked” data that cover only two unrepresentative years or to dismiss a large number of careful studies just because they have not disclosed all of their data. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:17 am
Galway-Cavendish and Harvey (Township)- Elysia Cherry, Legal AssistantVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:36 am
A more moderate response came from Joel Brenner, who compared the report to a fruitcake, “chock full of tasty cherries—and other bits that are nuts. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
The Court relied on the doctrine of res judicata and in particular the CA decision in Unilin v Berry [2007] EWCA Civ 364. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
FodyThe Hacker’s Guide to New Year’s Resolutions - Elysia Cherry, Legal AssistantVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:56 am
Astiana v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
Suspended Illinois lawyer drops suit over her nude photos- Elysia Cherry, Legal AssistantVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
[This post follows up on my previous post on this judgment on this blog.]In Koushal v Naz—the case being touted as one of its worst judgments—a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court recently overturned a 2009 decision of Delhi High Court which had struck down the criminalisation of sodomy by s 377 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 as unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 2:49 am
The ‘judgment’ is a series of long quotations from previous cases, with little effort to explain how these cherry-picked precedents relate to the case at hand or justify the conclusions that the judges ultimately reach.I will do a point-by-point critique of the judgment in another post. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 6:56 am
Mendel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Jackson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:47 am
Status of PIPA Upon the request of the Alberta Information and Privacy Commissioner and the Attorney General, the SCC did not cherry pick which provisions of PIPA violate the Charter. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
EEOC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
Many businesses still cherry-pick the co [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
A final thought: at least since 1978 (Klass v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” (The footnote provides the name and citation of the opinion: Crawford v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
Now, Cherry Hill is a great town. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:20 am
But one can't say the same about Dewey v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
In pertinent part, CPL 240.40(2)(b)(v) reads as follows: “2. [read post]
