Search for: "Clark v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 3,805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1994, in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:23 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Attorney General Reference No. 116 of 2009 [2010] EWCA Crim 577 (11 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MC (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 347 (31 March 2010) Raissi v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 337 (31 March 2010) Clarke & Anor v Corless & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 338 (31 March 2010) Child Maintenance and… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Michigan Supreme Court should uphold his First Amendment rights [Clark Neily and Jay Schweikert on Cato Institute brief in Michigan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:26 am by Native American Rights Fund
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html O'Brien v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Reuben Clark Law School; Government of the State of Utah - Utah Supreme Court) have posted Triangulating Ordinary Meaning on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:52 am by Moll Law Group
Clark, the court held that state courts cannot adopt rules that single out arbitration agreements for negative treatment. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of the Case As described in the Court’s opinion, it previously catalogued the varied versions of the insanity defense that States have adopted to absolve mentally ill defendants of criminal culpability in Clark v. [read post]