Search for: "Company v. Review Board"
Results 581 - 600
of 5,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Quoting Lauridsen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
In a recent decision, Everport Terminal Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 3:10 am
Edison Co. of New York v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
Coos County Board of County Commissioners v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) recently affirmed its prior determination that where an investor’s non-independent director is appointed to the board of a public utility or public utility holding company, that appointment rebuts the presumption of a lack of control between the entities, such that the investor and public utility should be deemed “affiliates” under section 35.36(a)(9)(v) of FERC’s regulations. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 10:23 pm
V. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:36 pm
Case Name: Ronda Gaines v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 2:27 pm
The injured person appealed, but the Reviewing Board affirmed the denial. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
The court in Airgas was locked into the reasoning by the Supreme Court in Selectica that held that poison pills were not to be given a more searching review even when the company had in place a staggered board. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Yesterday, in Lorenzo v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:25 am
Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:25 am
Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB). [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 2:30 am
At the beginning of its decision, the Review Board accepted that the works were indeed created by AI without any creative contribution from a human actor. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 2:30 am
At the beginning of its decision, the Review Board accepted that the works were indeed created by AI without any creative contribution from a human actor. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
Audubon Soc'y v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 7:39 pm
Thus, a board that is negligent cannot be held liable for a bad decision when its company has a director exculpation provision in its charter. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:49 am
Rossette—i.e., situations where there could be both direct claims litigable by stockholders and derivative claims subject to control of the company’s board, and in UFCW Union & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
