Search for: "Cooper v. U.s.*"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 10:21 am
Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Wagner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:37 am
Florida v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Pregis Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Conway v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Cooper Tools, Inc., 2010 WL 1418244, at *3-4 (D.S.D. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
CREED-21 v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:00 pm
The Seventh Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
(Strickland was a capital case.)This panel questioned the validity of prior Ninth Circuit decisions like Cooper-Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In the 1992 case of New York v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
“Trey” Cooper III, for appellant. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
Council, Inc.,467 U.S. 837, 842 (1984); accord Cooper, 536 F.3d at 1337(quoting Hawkins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court, however, cited the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in Barcelona.com, Inc v Excelentisimo Ayuntamiento de Barcelona, 330 F.3d 616 (4th Cir,. 2003, here) and the Second Circuit ruling in ITC Ltd v Punchgini, 482 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2007) (the Bukhara case, here) to the effect that those provisions give non-US parties rights that are coextensive with, not greater than, those otherwise provided under the Lanham Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
(quotingKerr v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:54 pm
” Cooper v. [read post]
