Search for: "Does 1-215"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 12:12 am
Why does all this matter? [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
But here’s the thing: the government still does need a bill—for a variety of reasons. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, now codified as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Despite staffing shortages, the department does not have a backlog of safety inspections; all mandated inspections had been completed for 2013. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
We remind everyone that the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast welcomes feedback, either by email (CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com) or voicemail (+1 202 862 5785). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
Huffman, 222 Ariz. 416, 215 P.3d 390 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2009). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
decision not to take any action to implement this more general rule by referring to s37(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
On the likelihood of success of the merits, the government argues that the Section 215 program does not implicate constitutional privacy rights, and would be reasonable even if it did. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm
“1 This same conclusion applies to Article 17, the right to privacy. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:54 am
How does this work? [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
Furthermore, the court stated that “deception does not render a defendant’s confession or relinquishment of evidence inadmissible. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Section 215 sunsets on June 1, 2015. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
But common law does not define the entire universe of “judge administered” law in the United States.[1]This chapter, provides a brief introduction to the other manifestation of judge administered law--equity. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
The Court concluded that the payment failed the requirement of section 71(b)(1)(B), which provides that, among other things, a payment is not deductible alimony unless “the divorce or separation instrument does not designate such payment as a payment which is not includible in gross income under this section and not allowable as a deduction under section 215. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
It does less than the original USA FREEDOM. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:23 pm
(see Table 1 and Table 2 below). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
Page 1 Noah v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:31 am
The first question goes to the legality of the officer’s actions; the second goes to whether he can be held liable even if the answer to (1) is yes (if the answer to (1) is no, the case stops there). [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
§ 1254(1), as this amicus brief explains.) [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:29 pm
Still, some supporters of surveillance reform have said the measure does not go far enough. [read post]
