Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 581 - 600
of 9,552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2018, 3:19 pm
” Sandoz Br. at 1, 12-17. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:18 pm
The original application, covering classes 9, 16, 25, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 43 was divided into two applications on 1 August 2019, around a week after the public backlash began. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
We agree with the Examiner that the printed matter on the pathology booklet does not serve to patentably distinguish the subject matter of claim 1 from the prior art. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 9:20 am
The expected dates of proclamation are as follows: July 1, 2018 for the amendments to modernize the Act and the holdback rules; and October 1, 2019 for the amendments related to prompt payment, adjudication and liens against municipalities. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Because of this lack of legal security claim 1 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
What does this all mean to you? [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
Reg. 26,967 (May 24, 1977).FN1 [FN1 Executive Order No. 11,991 amended Executive Order No. 1 11,514, 35 Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
However, regarding “who” can be an inventor, the America Invents Act, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 10:10 am
His solution: treat software claims as means- (or steps-) plus-function claims according to 35 USC 112(f), thereby restricting the claims only to the embodiments disclosed in the specification and equivalents.Part 1 of the article provides historical background on functional claims and the evolution of 35 USC 112(f). [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
The jury determined that“[c]laims 1 to 7 and 9 of [Metso’s] ’618 patent [we]re notinvalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:02 am
” 35 U.S.C. 100(b). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 10:07 am
Section 35 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:58 am
If the initial set of interrogatories does not exhaust this limit, the balance may be propounded in subsequent sets. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:18 pm
” Belkin had noted that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:09 am
This period is not extendable.One might ask if a voluntary publication under 1.221 does "count" as a publication under 35 USC 1.22(b) which states in pertinent part:(b) PUBLICATION.-(1) IN GENERAL. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:23 am
I suppose that the word “use” does appear in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:25 am
What does Amazon do to improve the safety of its drivers and the communities they serve? [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
Ex. 1001, 1:11–14,1:33–35. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
The district court granted appellees’ motionsto dismiss for failure to state a claim and entered finaljudgment that claims 1–25 and 33–36 of the ’179 patentare ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:21 pm
Patent No. 6,781,231 (the ‘231 patent), but that claim 1 is invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
