Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 581 - 600 of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2021, 5:05 am
TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out? [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:40 pm
If this doesn’t amount to reversing the presumption of innocence, one wonders what does. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
The Final Rule specifically identifies and describes the following factors as relevant to the economic reality standard: 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:03 am by Charles Kels
Nonetheless, it is fair to say — as Anderson inferred in his earlier post — that LOAC both anticipates and provides mechanisms for states to mobilize ostensibly civilian units and personnel in wartime, either as part of the military itself (per GPW, Article 4(A)(1) and AP I, Article 43(3)) or aligned with it in specified ways (per GPW, Article 4(A)(2) and AP I, Article 43(1)). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:11 am by CMS
Even if that evidence had been before the court, the mere existence of a surplus does not automatically mean that the premises in question are being used mainly for fundraising. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Once again, harm/materiality takes a hammering because the claim is §43(a)(1)(A) and not §43(a)(1)(B), for no good reason. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Notably, “Young Living does not cite any binding case law to support its argument that the New York General Business Law does not protect against advertising that lacks substantiation. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Christine Hurt
  Here are the blogs that have been cited more than once: Rank # of Citations Blog (1) 45 Sentencing Law and Policy (43 fed; 2 state) (2) 8 Volokh Conspiracy (7 fed; 1 state) (3) 6 Patently 0 (6 fed) (4) 4 The Confrontation Blog (1 fed, 3 state) (5) 3 ProfessorBainbridge (3 state) (5) 3 Election Law Blog (2… [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:36 am by emagraken
McDiarmid, 2009 BCSC 28, the order requiring a plaintiff attend an IME relatively close to trial does not necessarily mean that the trial will be adjourned or the plaintiff prejudiced: paras. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm by Bill Marler
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]