Search for: "Does 1-61"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
Morgan, 2017 SCC 61, this last Thursday, December 14, 2017. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 2:31 am
A broad majority (57% - 61 votes) thinks that, yes, when given the opportunity to address this issue the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will say that exhaustion of the right of distribution as per Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) encompasses both tangible and intangible copies. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:38 am
It stated that the report “does not categorically rule out the existence of marks similar or identical to the contested mark” and that “the applicant’s alleged diligence cannot be proven” (paragraph 60). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:19 am
., 61 USPQ2d 1086 (TTAB 2001), the Board recognized that there are two forms of functionality: utilitarian functionality and aesthetic functionality. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 8:08 pm
In Order P2018-06, the Alberta Privacy Commissioner explained this further as follows, [para 61] Section 1(1)(e) of PIPA establishes that the Legislature does not use the term “employee” to refer to an employee at common law. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
”[1] The asserted legal authority for these PLI warrants’[2] was SCA § 2703(c)(1)(A). [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:02 pm
Therefore, governmental entities that are neither cities nor counties (e.g., special districts and joint powers authorities) may consider requesting the transfer of CLFR funds from governmental entities with transfer authority (i.e., the state, cities, and counties) (See Secs. 602(c)(3); 603(c)(3).) [5] See Sec. 603(c)(1). [6] Sec. 603(c)(1)(A); Rule, pp. 10-45. [7] Sec. 603(c)(1)(B); Rule, pp. 45-51. [8] Sec. 603(c)(1)(C); Rule, pp. 51-61. [9] Sec.… [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm
§ 112, ¶ 2 (2006).1 Although the districtcourt found these claims indefinite, it did not address theissue of invalidity because Appellee, Life360, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Act, lines 1346-1349, at page 61.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
For the purpose of this blogpost, the following question is relevant: “Does article 61(1) of Regulation [2018/858] constitute, for vehicle manufacturers, a legal obligation within the meaning of article 6(1)(c) of the GDPR which justifies the disclosure of VINs or information linked to VINs to independent operators as other controllers within the meaning of point 7 of Article 4 of the GDPR? [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Read his full op-ed, then read on to see what I made of some of the key points. 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
1. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:23 am
But the future does not have to look so grim. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:26 am
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:11 am
Smart, 21 M.J. 15, 18-19 and n. 1 (CMA 1985). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
A non-moving violation does not come with any points. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 1:57 pm
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:30 am
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]
