Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:35 pm
In ordering dismissal, Judge Davis wrote: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims … are dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:41 pm
” The question in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:34 am
Davis, in which the court held that a prisoner’s motion to alter or amend a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) should not be treated as a second or successive petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:04 am
In its 7-2 ruling on Monday in Banister v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
The US Supreme Court held Monday in Banister v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:40 am
In Bannister v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
Davis, another 7-2 decision, the court held that a prisoner’s motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), which sets out the procedures for a motion to alter or amend a judgment, should not be treated as a second or successive petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:30 pm
The Federal Judicial Center has a new documentary history in its series of Famous Federal Trials: U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:30 am
Davis 19-1254Issues: (1) Whether the foregone-conclusion exception to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination established in Fisher v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
I will then describe an important workaround, first described by Professor Darien Shanske of the University of California at Davis, that would allow the Federal Reserve to give assistance to states and cities without interference from Republicans in the Senate or the White House.Punishing One’s Own Troops: How Could a Crisis of This Magnitude Not Call for All Hands on Deck? [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am
It had established the permanence of the federal Union.In fact, it seems to me that the war’s success (as buttressed by Texas v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am
As anyone familiar with the actual law in Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, conservative jurists in cases like Town of Greece v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
