Search for: "FIELDS v. USA" Results 581 - 600 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am by Schachtman
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by William C. MacLeod and Darby Hobbs
”  There is no doubt that the FTC and the DOJ will be fielding more questions from Congress as to whether their international activities are undermining US policy. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Ninth Circuit’s unpublished April 17, 2018 opinion in Aqua Star (USA) Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:33 am by admin
(v) may want to include information about DNA Adoption Networking in their adoption education programs. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
Los Angeles attorney, and Los Angeles Best Lawyers’ First Amendment Law Lawyer of the Year for 2012, Gary Bostwick, of the law firm, Bostwick & Jassey LLP, is taking the California State Bar to court, among other things challenging the state’s Senate Bill 94 (“SB 94?) [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Utility of Mediation in Sri Lanka by  Saranee Gunathilaka* Introduction Today, in Sri Lanka, mediation has become a coerced choice upon parties to a dispute. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Bain, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., for amici Ad Hoc Copyright Coalition; Commercial Internet Exchange; Computer & Communications Industry Association; Information Technology Association of America; Netcoalition.com; United States Internet Industry Association, and United States Telecommunications Association. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
” [36] Courts look at whether the injuries to the spectator were foreseeable. [37] Along those same lines, those who sponsor sporting events owe their spectators and participants a limited duty of care. [38] Many states have adopted a limited-liability doctrine where defendants have a limited duty to maintain reasonable care in keeping their premises safe. [39] This is the reason why many sports facilities have screened or fenced off fields and arenas [40]. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]