Search for: "Fischer v Fischer" Results 581 - 600 of 957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Frank v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:33 pm by Jon Gelman
Further studies on histological subtypes and the analysis of other potentially relevant factors are crucial for discovering putative mechanisms The report:  Rabstein S, Harth V, Pesch B, Pallapies D, Lotz A, Justenhoven C, Baisch C,Schiffermann M, Haas S, Fischer H-P, Heinze E, Pierl C, Brauch H, Hamann U, Ko Y,Brüning T, "Night work and breast cancer estrogen receptor status – results from the… [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:06 am by Jon Gelman
Further studies on histological subtypes and the analysis of other potentially relevant factors are crucial for discovering putative mechanisms The report:  Rabstein S, Harth V, Pesch B, Pallapies D, Lotz A, Justenhoven C, Baisch C,Schiffermann M, Haas S, Fischer H-P, Heinze E, Pierl C, Brauch H, Hamann U, Ko Y,Brüning T, "Night work and breast cancer estrogen receptor status – results from the… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that, as explained in a recent filing in Swartz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that “Arizona’s attorney general wants the U.S. [read post]