Search for: "Fischer v Fischer"
Results 581 - 600
of 957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Frank v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Fischer, 555 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
”) Bowman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am
Turner v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:33 pm
Further studies on histological subtypes and the analysis of other potentially relevant factors are crucial for discovering putative mechanisms The report: Rabstein S, Harth V, Pesch B, Pallapies D, Lotz A, Justenhoven C, Baisch C,Schiffermann M, Haas S, Fischer H-P, Heinze E, Pierl C, Brauch H, Hamann U, Ko Y,Brüning T, "Night work and breast cancer estrogen receptor status – results from the… [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:06 am
Further studies on histological subtypes and the analysis of other potentially relevant factors are crucial for discovering putative mechanisms The report: Rabstein S, Harth V, Pesch B, Pallapies D, Lotz A, Justenhoven C, Baisch C,Schiffermann M, Haas S, Fischer H-P, Heinze E, Pierl C, Brauch H, Hamann U, Ko Y,Brüning T, "Night work and breast cancer estrogen receptor status – results from the… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:47 pm
Justice Scalia would be proud.United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:56 am
Hathaway’s dissent in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that, as explained in a recent filing in Swartz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that “Arizona’s attorney general wants the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Dohme v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Vacha v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
Fischer and Rick D. [read post]